Good results make people dance. The jubilant ones rejoice time and again for the out come assured and achieved. The recent public demonstration of Brussels, unlike of the Strasberg, was, lively, popular and thematic. It was well organized peaceful as its name and promising in its content and form as well. Good job and well done. A mission that deserves appreciation. Still, the so-called unscrupulous, self-asserted and vindictive-minded "civic societies" will spam and spoil the motive of such popular and thematic demonstrations unless scrutinized and handled with care. And, this should be a job of every concerned Eritrean. Look there! for a good outcome every one claim and cheers. The peaceful means of struggle with all its civility will yield such a fruit. The combination of peaceful and armed struggle for which the Eritrean Democratic Alliance (EDA) has endorsed in its second regular meeting sheds the light with in short period of time. The recently achieved military operations of EDA, the lively coordination of thoughts and the sweeping victories of our civic society (NECS) are tangible evidences of the struggle of resented Eritreans.

There are confused "civic societies" claiming and wishing to sit for a dialogue. The recently popped idea of Isaias"s readiness for dialogue with some selected oppositions is intended to:
1. To negotiate with those organizations to which the regime considers as nationalists. Even though the existence of such political organizations or civic societies is questionable in the opposition camp; the so attributed organizations are those who had been collaborating with the regime in various streams. There could be no surprise if the regime negotiates and accommodates them as nationalists for the role they have played in paralyzing the opposition camp as a lukewarm.
2. To negotiate with those civic societies and web sites those have been playing actively in exposing and derailing the ongoing struggle. Such civic societies after the dialogue will fill the blank of the political organization to which the regime considers as stooges. The so-called "civic societies" are therefore waiting for such a lottery staying tuned and salivated.

3. (The third part the regime might think) to negotiate with is the so-called political brokers be it political organizations or "civic societies" which strive to liquidate and disperse the political organizations which pose a threat to the regime. Such forces will try their best to convince, bribe, or naturalize the strong, integrated, and principled leaders and organizations to escort with them. If failed the term of negotiation will automatically reverse and terminated. The real dialogue however should be carried-out with those organizations capable of posing a threat towards the central government not with its own satellites. At this juncture, such situation is not ripe in Eritrea. The regime might think of ambushing some selected organizations of the above categories. The trap is already exposed and dehumanized. The only alternative left for the political organizations and the true civic societies struggling for a real and radical change is to coordinate and intensify the struggle as now. The wolves in sheep clothing should also be followed and inspected. If any dialogue is needed the regime, prior to any step, should seat with our neighbors to settle all its problems. There fore, for a good and satisfactory achievement lets puts our hands together and work for a better result. Let's appreciate the splendid job too.